Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Europe—the Hidden Superpower

By Ron Fraser

April 5, 2010 | From theTrumpet.com

Though each appears to be presently enduring crisis, Rome and Berlin continue their respective efforts to assert themselves at the helm of the rising European empire.

To really come to grips with just how the final resurrection of the Holy Roman Empire is steadily developing to global status, one has to dig deeply behind the headlines, behind the bias and the shallowness of reports in the press and mass media. It takes a long view of history and a unique handling of predictive analysis based on current events linked to history to see the European Union in its true perspective. The plain truth is that the European Union is the second-greatest power on the world scene today, destined to soon become the dominant superpower in the very near future.

Those who scoff at the idea of a resurrected Holy Roman Empire under the domination of Rome and Berlin simply reflect a shallow perspective of history as it is attached to ongoing current world events. They lack the understanding of the modern-day identity of nations which from ancient times were prophesied to fulfill predominant roles in major world events today. Thus they are simply unable to rise above shallow reactions to world events and find the confidence with which the Trumpet forecasts the future outcome of such events quite disconcerting.

Yet, our rejoinder to the scoffers is as simple as that which Jesus Christ gave to those who doubted Him. Just believe our works! It is only a matter of time before you will witness, live through and have to endure the results of the great world events portrayed in the prophecies of your Bible.

Throughout the previous six resurrections of the Roman Empire, each of those imperial revivals, dating from the time of Justinian’s restoration in A.D. 554, was only made possible by the cooperation of two traditionally competing entities—the church and the state. Though, from time to time, one predominated over the other in a perpetual vying for dominant power, it was only by the two cooperating with each other in their respective imperial aims that the Roman Empire was able to perpetuate itself through various revivals throughout the past two millennia.

Under the influence of the Vatican, the empire became known from the time of Charlemagne—crowned emperor in A.D. 800—as the “Holy” Roman Empire. Then under Emperor Maximilian, from 1510 on the empire was known as “the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation.” This title attested to the political, military and economic power of the German state in union with the spiritual influence of the Vatican as being the two predominant forces conjoined to hold the empire together.

Tracking forward to that which our editor in chief has identified as the seventh and latest resurrection of this ancient imperial entity, it is already apparent to legitimate commentators that the European Union is in fact the second-greatest power on the world scene today, next to a United States in very obvious and increasingly rapid decline.

One of the most incisive and accurate views of Europe (albeit unfashionable in foreign-policy circles) is that of Andrew Moravcsik, professor of politics and international affairs at Princeton University. In an interview published by Global Europe, Sept. 14, 2009, Moravcsik stated, “Europe, singly and collectively, is the most underrated actor in world politics today. … In fact, the world is bipolar. Europe and the U.S. are the only two global superpowers. This will remain true for the foreseeable future. Indeed, European power is rising. … It is the most ambitious and successful international organization of all time, pioneering institutional practices far in advance of anything elsewhere. … European nations, singly and collectively, are the only other states in the world today, besides the U.S., to exert global influence across the full spectrum from ‘hard’ to ‘soft’ power.”

Students of international relations recognize that it is in the military sphere that both the imperial prestige and the potential for the projection of imperial initiatives of any world power come to the fore. In this respect, Moravcsik has a firm grasp on the realities. In the same interview, he maintained that “Europe is comfortably established as the world’s ‘second’ military power, with 50,000-100,000 combat troops active throughout the globe over most of the past two decades. … In nuclear power, air power, weapons production, or naval power as well, no one except the U.S. comes close to European power projection capability” (emphasis mine).

This is exactly the position that the Trumpet has taken on Europe over the past two decades. Check our archive to verify that. Until recently, few have acknowledged the reality of European power. The chattering classes have been busy promoting headlines touting the rise of such powers as China and India, contrasting this with their shallow view of Europe as a spent geopolitical force. Meanwhile the elites who guide the development of the European Union have been content to let the world be fooled by such spurious headlines. The world press and media have done a great service to the European imperialists by diverting the attention of the public significantly away from the reality of their ongoing engagement in promoting their vision of a resurrection of European power under the aegis of Rome and Berlin.

The biggest story emanating from Rome today is, in reality, not the revelations of the behavior of pedophile priests. It is the largely unpublicized fact of the powerful influence of the Vatican in every single institution of note that comprises the European Union. The biggest story emanating from Berlin today is not the constant crises faced by Angela Merkel’s failing coalition. It is how the German power elites manage each crisis to the advantage of the promotion of Germanic imperial power.

The power of Vatican influence in the EU was recently portrayed by an EU Commission quietly moving to institutionalize Sunday as the mandatory day of worship across the whole EU spectrum. Germany has already mandated Sunday as that nation’s national day of rest and worship. It is now only a matter of time before the powerful Catholic elites force that mandate onto all member nations of the European Union. When that has been achieved, and Rome’s official day of worship enshrined in European law, the penalties for non-compliance will soon be enacted on those who refuse to bow to Rome. The results are prophesied in Revelation 13 in your Bible.

In a more recent article published in the March 2010 edition of Current History, Professor Moravcsik dates Europe’s rise to power from 1989. Why that particular year? On Nov. 11, 1989, the Berlin Wall collapsed and Germany, divided since defeat in World War ii, united to quickly become the EU’s leading political force. Moravcsik states that “Since 1989, Europe’s ‘power of attraction’ has helped stabilize the polities and economies of over a dozen neighboring countries.” It is more than coincidence that this “stabilization” happens to coincide with Germany’s post-Soviet rise to power in Europe.

A feature article in the March 11 edition of the Economist stated that Germany “has spent the past decade smashing its own taboos. In 1999 it sent its armed forces into battle for the first time since the Second World War … to protect Kosovo from Yugoslavia.” What the article does not state is that it was Germany and the Vatican’s deliberate challenge to the balance of power in the Balkans at that time—by their recognition of Croatia and Slovenia as sovereign nation states separate to greater Yugoslavia—that started the Balkan wars. This invited German participation in the subsequent Balkan conflict under the NATO umbrella. The upshot is that Germany has now announced that its occupation force in Kosovo will not be leaving!

German nationalism enjoyed a convenient and seemingly benign revival during the nation’s hosting of the football World Cup in 2006. The German flag was paraded openly and prolifically during that tournament demonstrating a great revival in national patriotism and pride. The Economist noted that “Germany now defends its national interests more frankly, especially in Europe.” To those with a decent memory of 20th-century history, this presents a degree of concern, for, as the Economist noted, “a more self-confident Germany would also be a more selfish one.” That has recently been demonstrated by Germany’s approach to the Greek financial crisis.

Noting that “Germany’s most popular politician is Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, the aristocratic defense minister,” the Economist notes that “few people doubt that Germany’s destiny lies within it. National pride is partly linked to a sense of international duty.”

What is the German perception of its “international duty”? The Economist makes a fatal mistake in its answer to that question by declaring that “Germany’s friends no longer worry much that pride will ever become hubris again.” That is a classic Anglo-Saxon pacifistically naive assumption which denies the realities of history. It denies the very nature of German history from the time that Bismarck united Germany into a single nation which soon became a singular military power. The results were the Franco-Prussian War of 1871, less than half a century later the First World War, and less than a quarter century following that, the Second World War. There followed 44 years of a divided Germany, with no outbreak of war on the Continent. Then within two years of the reunification of Germany in 1990, the newly united nation, supported by the Vatican, triggered conflict in the Balkan Peninsula.

Can we not get the point—the true lesson of history here? Germany united is a danger to peace in Europe! In fact, Germany united at the helm of a superpower now only second in global power projection to the United States is a threat to world peace!

That Germany is the powerhouse of Europe economically, financially, industrially and militarily is an undeniable fact. Professor Moravcsik states the unvarnished truth that “In trade and investment affairs, Europe is a global economic superpower larger that the United States and far ahead of countries such as China and India” (Current History, op. cit.). By simple extrapolation, that places Germany, as Europe’s leader in all these spheres, at the very forefront of global powers.

Moravcsik adds, “Taken together with its military activities, Europe’s civilian capabilities, economic importance, and political attractiveness render it a full-spectrum power, wielding a wide range of instruments for regional and global influence.” Once again, Europe’s leading power by far, Germany, is at the forefront in demonstrating these capabilities.

Yet Andrew Moravcsik is sufficiently astute as to detect the near absolute blindness of foreign-policy exponents in Washington in not even beginning to recognize the dangers posed by the new European superpower. He notes that “in Washington, Europe is still widely viewed as a declining region, barely able to take care of its own geopolitical interests, and increasingly irrelevant …. This is a failure to learn not simply from history, but from international relations theory.”

Washington will soon rue its failure to learn the lesson of history and the lessons of the very theory of international relations taught at its institutions of higher learning. In the meantime, as the gullible Western press and mass media divert the public’s attention to the spurious, the banal and the salacious, Rome and Berlin rise as the powers of the future soon to put paid to the views of the naive and the ignorant who view Europe simply as a spent force. Nothing could be farther from the truth!

For a firm grasp on the reality of global affairs, in particular the rising power of the European superstate, read our latest booklet, He Was Right.

Archived at Europe—the Hidden Superpower

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Michelle confesses Kenya is Obama's home country?



President usurper Obama/Soetoro/Obama, regardless of his proud and stubborn refusal to be transparent (as promised - no change there), paying expensive lawyers hush money (at American taxpayers' expense) to keep his revealing documents in the dark, is not a natural born citizen of two American parents and is therefore not eligible to be POTUS according to the Constitution. It's past time the fraud and foreigner is brought to justice! Emperor Obama has got to go! And let him take his illegal alien aunt with him who has stolen from the American people.
http://www.davidbenariel.org/

Monday, April 5, 2010

Beyond Babylon at Buffalo Bill Dam!

Beyond Babylon at Buffalo Bill Dam

After visiting Devil's Tower I was en route to Yellowstone and discovered the Buffalo Bill Dam. I thought I could kill two birds with one stone (or paver block) by advertising Beyond Babylon and the Buffalo Bill Dam. Now I can say Beyond Babylon is set in stone!

Buffalo Bill Dam

http://www.davidbenariel.org/

American Patriot Foundation: FTC Terry Lakin Defense Fund



A top-ranking, highly decorated officer in the U.S. Army says he's now refusing all orders until President Barack Obama finally releases his long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate to prove his eligibility to serve as commander in chief.

"I feel I have no choice but the distasteful one of inviting my own court martial," said Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, an active-duty flight surgeon charged with caring for Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey's pilots and air crew. "The Constitution matters. The truth matters."

"For the first time in all my years of service to our great nation, and at great peril to my career and future, I am choosing to disobey what I believe are illegal orders, including an order to deploy to Afghanistan for my second tour of duty there. I will disobey my orders to deploy because I – and I believe all servicemen and women and the American people – deserve the truth about President Obama's constitutional eligibility to the office of the presidency and the commander in chief.

"If he is ineligible, then my orders – and indeed all orders – are illegal because all orders have their origin with the commander in chief as handed down through the chain of command." - Army 'showdown' at eligibility corral

Lt. Col. Terry Lakin is the highest-ranking and first active-duty officer to refuse to obey orders based on President Obama's eligibility.

************


President usurper Obama/Soetoro/Obama, regardless of his proud and stubborn refusal to be transparent (as promised - no change there), paying expensive lawyers hush money (at American taxpayers' expense) to keep his revealing documents in the dark, is not a natural born citizen of two American parents and is therefore not eligible to be POTUS according to the Constitution. It's past time the fraud and foreigner is brought to justice! Emperor Obama has got to go! And let him take his illegal alien aunt with him who has stolen from the American people.
http://www.davidbenariel.org/

Sunday, April 4, 2010

US has Bosnian blood on its hands

US gave birth to Muslim state in heart of Europe

By Ted Belman

The Ottawa Citizen reports - Former general speaks out about the war he can’t forget

Maj.-Gen. Lewis MacKenzie is once again making headlines in Sarajevo, where, 18 years ago, he led a United Nations peacekeeping operation that attempted to keep Bosnian Muslims and Serbs from killing each other.

While MacKenzie blamed Muslims for killing Muslims he also considered Serbian shelling of Sarajevo a war crime. But his condemnation was mostly directed at the US:


“There’s more than enough blame to go around for all sides,” he said, adding that if he was called to testify in the Karadzic case, he would not hesitate to lay blame at the former Bosnian leader’s feet. “Of the most serious accusations against Karadzic, I do consider the use of heavy artillery against civilian targets in Sarajevo … to strike fear into the heart of the population to be a war crime.”

But MacKenzie suggested that if fault lies anywhere for sparking Bosnia’s descent into civil war, it lies with the United States.

In 1992, under the auspices of the European Community, the Bosnian Muslims, Serbs and Croats signed a peace agreement, the Lisbon Agreement, in which Bosnia would be carved into ethnic cantons. But according to some accounts, former U.S. ambassador Warren Zimmermann met the Bosnian Muslim president Alija Izetbegovic and told him that if he withdrew from the agreement and unilaterally declared independence, the United States would support him. In effect, Izetbegovic was encouraged to think he would be establishing the first Muslim nation in the heart of Europe.

However, as far as the Bosnian Serbs were concerned, they weren’t going to be ruled by Muslims, who, the Serbs believed, were intent on creating an Islamic fundamentalist state. War was the only alternative once the Bosnian Muslims withdrew from the Lisbon Agreement.
The problem for the Muslims was that the Serbs had the stronger military, and unless they...

Read the whole entry »

************

I believe that most Germans are merely naive or ordinary citizens (like this country), but that the powers that be behind the scenes, the real rulers of Germany, are intent on misleading and manipulating the German army and people again to form their final and Fourth Reich, just as Bible prophecy warns.

Growing evidence of this troubling trend was clearly manifest in the Balkans, where Germany led the assault against our faithful WWII allies, the Serbs, and raped and destroyed Yugoslavia and slaughtered the Orthodox, all as groundwork for their unholy Roman Empire of the German Nation.

How did Germany do this when the German constitution forbids it? The United States were useful idiots for Germany and the bloody Vatican under our shameful president, Bill Clinton, and helped to do their dirty work for them in lockstep with NATO (the same NATO/UN/EU forces about to be used and abused in the Middle East, wolves in sheep's clothing, "peacekeepers" with their evil eye on Jerusalem, especially the Temple Mount).

By foolishly aiding and abetting German hegemony throughout Europe, we are actually helping to create the Frankenstein Monster that will destroy us! Margaret Thatcher couldn't have been more right: "You have not anchored Germany to Europe; you have anchored Europe to a newly dominant, unified Germany. In the end, my friends, you’ll find it will not work" (The Downing Street Years). - Is Germany in Danger of Backsliding?

http://www.davidbenariel.org/

Did Christ Rise on Easter?

By Stephen Flurry

April 2, 2010

Consider the one sign proving His messiahship.

Traditional Christianity has long believed that Christ was buried on the afternoon of Good Friday and resurrected early Sunday morning—one day and two nights later—even though this belief cuts in half the time frame Christ established as proof of His messiahship: “For as [Jonah] was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth” (Matthew 12:40).

Besides that, the Bible nowhere mentions “Good Friday” or “Easter” (Acts 12:4 is a mistranslation). What it does say is that Jesus Christ was crucified on Passover (Matthew 26:2).

In ancient Israel, God’s people observed Passover by killing lambs and smearing blood over their doorposts (read Exodus 12). God then passed over each house where the blood was applied, sparing that household from death. All this was only a type of “Christ our Passover,” as it says in 1 Corinthians 5:7. Today, it is Christ’s shed blood that spares the life of a truly repentant Christian.

Jesus Christ died in A.D. 31. The Passover that year fell on Wednesday, April 25 (not Friday). Because God’s days begin and end at sunset, the actual Passover ceremony that Jesus observed with His disciples occurred Tuesday night—the beginning of the 14th day of the first month on the Hebrew calendar. On Tuesday afternoon, the disciples had asked Jesus about where to make preparations for the service (Matthew 26:17). That night, during the ceremony, Jesus changed the symbols, explaining that He was now that Passover sacrifice (Matthew 26:26-28).

After that Passover service, they went out into the Mount of Olives (verse 30). Christ spent most of the night praying while His disciples slept (verses 36-45). Early Wednesday morning, still on the 14th day of the first month, Judas came with the multitude to arrest Christ (verses 47-50). The crucifixion occurred later that same day.

At the “ninth hour” of the 14th, Jesus cried out (Matthew 27:46-50; Mark 15:34-37; Luke 23:44-46). This would have been at 3 p.m. on Wednesday afternoon. That night, at sunset, marked the beginning of the first day of Unleavened Bread—one of God’s holy days, as outlined in Leviticus 23 (see also Numbers 28:16-17).

The weekly Sabbath, of course, is on Saturday. But the first day of Unleavened Bread was the first of seven annual sabbaths instituted by God. Since most people do not observe God’s holy days today, they do not know that the Bible also refers to these days as sabbaths (see Leviticus 16:31; 23:24, 26-32, 39).

Now follow this course of events closely. In John 19:30, Jesus bowed His head and said, “It is finished.” Notice the very next verse: “The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day, (for that sabbath day was an high day,) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away” (verse 31). Here is where so many scholars jump the track. They assume that because the day of Christ’s crucifixion is referred to as “the preparation” prior to “the sabbath” (Matthew 27:62; Mark 15:42; Luke 23:54) that it must have been on Friday. But as John points out, the preparation day was actually before a sabbath that was a “high day”—an annual holy day.

John 19:32-42 explain what happened between Christ’s death and His burial. Notice especially verse 42: “There laid they Jesus therefore because of the Jews’ preparation day; for the sepulchre was nigh at hand.” They buried Him late Wednesday afternoon, before sunset, because, according to Jewish customs, all dead bodies had to be buried before the Sabbath, whether weekly or annual. So Christ died on the afternoon of the 14th at 3 p.m. He was buried later that afternoon before sunset. From that point, all we have to do is count three days and three nights to know when He was resurrected.

But first, let us go back to the Gospel account in Matthew to continue following the course of events. “Now the next day [after the Passover], that followed the day of the preparation, the chief priests and Pharisees came together unto Pilate, Saying, Sir, we remember that that deceiver said, while he was yet alive, After three days I will rise again” (Matthew 27:62-63). Even these deceived Jews knew what Christ said! After three days and three nights—not one day and two nights—“I will rise again”!

So Pilate set a watch on the sepulcher for three days and nights. The story continues in the first verse of the next chapter. “In the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulchre” (Matthew 28:1). Here again is where so many trip up—mainly because of a poor translation. The King James, along with just about every other Bible version, translates the first part of this verse, “In the end of the sabbath” or “after the sabbath.” But if you study the Greek text, you learn that the word for sabbath is actually plural! “After the sabbaths,” it should read.

Why is this significant? Jesus, remember, was crucified on a Wednesday afternoon and buried later that evening, before sunset. The next day, Thursday, was an annual sabbath. The day after that, was preparation day for the regular weekly Sabbath. The reason Matthew refers to sabbaths, plural, is because there were two sabbaths that week! When Matthew says Mary came early Sunday morning, before dawn, after one of the sabbaths, he is referring to the weekly Sabbath.

There is one more sequence of events that provides additional support for the 72-hour time frame. Mark 16:1 says Mary Magdalene and her companions bought spices “when the sabbath was past.” They were planning to prepare these ointments and spices so that they might anoint the body of Jesus. Yet Luke 23:56 says they prepared these spices and then rested on the weekly Sabbath day. Compare these two texts carefully.

Christ inspired four different Gospel accounts to be written so that all the important details of His life might be canonized. Mark said these women bought the spices after the sabbath was past. Luke said they prepared the spices before the Sabbath arrived. Those who hold to the Good Friday-Easter belief must conclude that these verses are a glaring contradiction. They are not! They complement each other perfectly, if you understand that there were two sabbaths that week. The women bought the spices on Friday, after the annual sabbath on Thursday. They prepared the spices that same day, before the weekly Sabbath, and then rested on the Sabbath according to God’s command.

When Mary entered the tomb early Sunday morning, before sunrise, [an angel] exclaimed, “He is not here: for he is risen, as he said. Come, see the place where the Lord lay” (Matthew 28:6). Yes indeed! He had already risen—the day before, just prior to sunset at the end of the weekly Sabbath. His death, burial and resurrection happened precisely the way He prophesied it would happen.

Why does it matter? Because Jesus Christ staked His claim to being your Savior on the fact that He would remain in the grave for three full days and nights.

Archived at Did Christ Rise on Easter?

The Two Witnesses

The Two Witnesses of Revelation 11
The Two Witnesses of Revelation 11. Who are these two prophets? What do they have to say? Why are they called the two witnesses? How will their message be proclaimed? And is there any special significance to the fact that they're headquartered in Jerusalem?

Two Witnesses to Testify in Jerusalem Against Europe
Two controversial figures, referred to in the Book of Revelation as two witnesses, two olive trees, two candlesticks and two prophets, will boldly declare GOD'S JUDGMENTS and proclaim the LORD'S CONTROVERSY (Micah 3:8; 6:1-2), delivering a BLISTERING MESSAGE and a SCORCHING CONDEMNATION -- just before NUCLEAR FIRE AND BRIMSTONE RAINS DOWN upon those who've rejected GOD'S ULTIMATUM (Isaiah 41:27; 30:27).

Will the Church of God Welcome the Two Witnesses?
Church of God minister Arlen Berkey, in "The Work of God in the Laodicean Era," makes a statement nobody in God's Church would disagree with: "The whole world will soon know about the two witnesses. They will not be welcome by this world."


The Work of God Must Go Forward!
The Work of God must go forward. The only work that's left to do now is focus on the NATIONAL LEVEL. We must get out God's ultimatum and fast! Europe is on the rise and Jerusalem is getting international attention (Zech. 14:2). Soon God's two witnesses will rise and shine in a world of darkness (Isa. 60:1-2). God's about to restore His lamp to the Middle East! (Rev. 11:3; 1 Kgs. 11:36; Amos 9:11; Zech. 12:8).


http://www.davidbenariel.org/